GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M340
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M340, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M340.
GRID K520
Radeon R7 M340 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M340 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M340 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M340 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M340 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M340 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M340 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M340 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M340 is 276 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M340 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M340.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M340. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M340 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK104 | Meso Pro DDR3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1021 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1021 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 17.16 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 74 Mh/s |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |