Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 M340
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 M340 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M340 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R7 M340 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M340 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M340 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M340 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M340 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M340 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M340 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M340 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M340 is 396 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M340 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M340.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M340 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M340. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M340 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF106 | Meso Pro DDR3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1021 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1021 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 17.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 74 Mh/s |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |