FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R7 M350
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M350.
Radeon R7 M350
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |