GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 650M has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GT 650M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GE | Opal |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |