GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 242 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |