GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260 stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon R7 M350
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 has 420% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M350.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 517 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
95−100
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
5−6
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
18−20
12−14
medium / 768p
12−14
9−10
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon R7 M350
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Code name
GT200
Opal
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
16 June 2008
5 May 2015
Pipelines
192
384
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
725 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
19.80
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
779.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
Not Listed
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Compute units
6
Check Price
