GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 149 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 285M SLI is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | Opal |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
| Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |