GRID K160Q vs Radeon R7 M350
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R7 M350
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q has 271% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 782 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Fortnite is 39% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Opal |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |