GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K280Q
Radeon R7 M350
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K280Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Opal |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |