GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M350

In this comparison between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K520

Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R7 M350
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K520 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	20−22	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	55−60	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	100−110	40−45
QHD / 1440p	55−60	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−35	18−20
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	95−100	50−55
ultra / 1080p	65−70	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	27−30	10−11
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	2−3
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	27−30	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	55−60	18−20
medium / 1080p	30−35	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 290% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	10−11	1−2
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	5−6
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	60−65	12−14
medium / 768p	35−40	9−10
high / 1080p	20−22	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R7 M350.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Radeon R7 M350
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Opal
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	19.80
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops	779.5 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6

GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares