Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M350 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce 920MX
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300