Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 64 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R7 360
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce 920MX
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300