Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M350 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 375 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce 920MX
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300