Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 420% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 542% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 920MX
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300