Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 M350
When comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 M350, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 M350 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M350
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | LPDDR4x | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 3266 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | iDG1LPDEV | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 31 October 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |