NVS 510 vs Radeon R7 M350

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon R7 M350
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 35 Watt.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 72 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
NVS 510 and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of NVS 510 is 782 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	60−65	120−130
medium / 768p	27−30	95−100
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	45−50	75−80
medium / 768p	10−11	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Fortnite is 136% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	7−8
low / 768p	18−20	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	1−2
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	5−6
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 69% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	6−7
low / 768p	0−1	12−14
medium / 768p	−	9−10
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 768p	45−50	75−80
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
high / 768p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon R7 M350
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK107	Opal
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 October 2012	5 May 2015
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	797 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	19.80
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	779.5 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6
	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares