Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 320 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 5000M is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 5000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 July 2010 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |