Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K1000M has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q1 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |