Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 19 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 2200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K3100M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |