Quadro K620M vs Radeon R7 M350
When choosing between Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 M350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 M350.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M350 has 16% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro K620M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K620M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 304 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro K620M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K620M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |