Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Radeon R7 M350
When choosing between Quadro T1000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M350, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T1000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M350.
Radeon R7 M350
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 Max Q | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 70 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 7000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro T1000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 Max Q | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |