Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 7000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro T2000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R7 M350 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs GeForce 920MX
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300