Radeon Pro 560X vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 560X stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560X has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro 560X is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560X is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 182 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 4080 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 560X | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 64.26 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | + |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |