Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro Vega 16 stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | HBM2 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 281% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 238% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 585% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega Mobile | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 15 November 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |