Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon PRO WX 3100 stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 85% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |