Radeon R7 M270 vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 M270 stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal XT / Mars | Opal |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | + |
| PowerTune | + | + |
| DualGraphics | + | + |
| ZeroCore | + | + |
| Switchable graphics | + | + |
| Mantle | + | + |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |