Radeon R7 M350 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between Radeon R7 M350 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M350 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon R7 M350

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 M350	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

Radeon R7 M350 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Radeon R7 M350 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	30−33
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	95−100	170−180
ultra / 1080p	40−45	90−95
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	18−20	24−27
high / 768p	65−70	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	85−90	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	1−2	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	2−3	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	7−8	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	5−6	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	12−14	50−55
medium / 768p	9−10	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R7 M350.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 M350	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Opal	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015	15 August 2020
Pipelines	384	96
Core clock speed	725 MHz
Boost Clock	825 MHz
Transistor count	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	19.80
Floating-point performance	779.5 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX		DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed
FreeSync	+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Eyefinity	+
HD3D	+
PowerTune	+
DualGraphics	+
ZeroCore	+
Switchable graphics	+
Mantle	+
Quick Sync		+
Compute units	6
		Check Price

Radeon R7 M350 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares