FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 M365X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 M365X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R7 M365X
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 M365X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 185 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Opal | Litho |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |