FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between FirePro M6000 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Heathrow | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |