FirePro M7740 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M7740 and Radeon R7 M365X is 1000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | RV740 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |