FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 M365X

When choosing between FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 M365X.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 30 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	3−4
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	12−14
medium / 1080p	24−27	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 371% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	200−210	110−120
medium / 768p	170−180	85−90
ultra / 1080p	95−100	35−40
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	140−150	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	90−95	40−45
ultra / 1080p	60−65	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	9−10
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	95−100	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	85−90	40−45
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	2−3
medium / 1080p	12−14	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	50−55	7−8
medium / 768p	30−35	6−7
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
high / 768p	50−55	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Bonaire	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2015	5 May 2015
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	930 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	23.04
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	737.3 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6
	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares