FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 M365X

In this comparison between FirePro W600 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W600 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W600 and Radeon R7 M365X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.
FirePro W600 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	0−1
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	10−12
medium / 1080p	10−11	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	150−160	110−120
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
ultra / 1080p	60−65	35−40
QHD / 1440p	30−35	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	10−11
high / 768p	90−95	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	65−70	40−45
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	9−10
medium / 1080p	10−11	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	40−45
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	5−6	1−2
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	2−3
medium / 1080p	7−8	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	30−33	7−8
medium / 768p	18−20	6−7
high / 1080p	10−12	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
high / 768p	40−45	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W600 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Cape Verde	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 June 2012	5 May 2015
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	750 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	23.04
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	737.3 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6
	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares