GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17P-G1 Max-Q | Litho |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 970M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 680
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GTX 970M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GTX 680
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GRID K220Q
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M