GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 135 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 9000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Litho |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GRID K220Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M