GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between GeForce MX150 and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX150 and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX150 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce MX150 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 568 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 5008 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 81% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX150 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G1 | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 May 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |