GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 M365X

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Radeon R7 M365X, check out specs charts below.

GRID K280Q

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	0−1
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	10−12
medium / 1080p	14−16	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	21−24	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	180−190	110−120
medium / 768p	150−160	85−90
ultra / 1080p	80−85	35−40
QHD / 1440p	45−50	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	120−130	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	80−85	40−45
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 81% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	9−10
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	85−90	45−50
medium / 1080p	40−45	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 140% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	20−22	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	70−75	40−45
medium / 768p	65−70	−
high / 1080p	21−24	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−11	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	2−3
medium / 1080p	10−11	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	20−22	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	4−5
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	40−45	7−8
medium / 768p	27−30	6−7
high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	23.04
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	737.3 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6

GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares