HD Graphics 5300 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between HD Graphics 5300 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 5300 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- HD Graphics 5300 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 800 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 19% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 62% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 113% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 207% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| HD Graphics 5300 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 257% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 111% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 5300 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |