Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |