Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 110% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Litho |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GRID K220Q
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M