Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 326% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 980% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Litho |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 690 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.04 | |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GRID K220Q
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M