Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
When comparing Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M365X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M365X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |