Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R7 M365X
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Litho |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |