Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K1000M stacks up against Radeon R7 M365X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 50 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q1 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |