Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |