Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 M365X

In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2200M

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 4012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	0−1
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	24−27	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	30−35	−
ultra / 1080p	27−30	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	12−14
medium / 1080p	35−40	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	110−120
medium / 768p	200−210	85−90
ultra / 1080p	110−120	35−40
QHD / 1440p	85−90	−
4K / 2160p	45−50	10−11
high / 768p	160−170	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	12−14
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	100−110	40−45
ultra / 1080p	75−80	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	2−3
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	9−10
medium / 1080p	24−27	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	30−35	−
ultra / 1080p	24−27	5−6
QHD / 1440p	14−16	1−2
low / 720p	120−130	45−50
medium / 1080p	70−75	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 293% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	30−35	2−3
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	14−16
medium / 1080p	35−40	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	40−45
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	3−4
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	12−14	1−2
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	2−3
medium / 1080p	16−18	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	4−5
medium / 1080p	20−22	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	70−75	7−8
medium / 768p	45−50	6−7
high / 1080p	24−27	3−4
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 860% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
high / 768p	55−60	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Code name	GM107	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 July 2014	5 May 2015
Pipelines	640	384
Core clock speed	667 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	23.04
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	737.3 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+

Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares