Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between Quadro K4000M and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K4000M and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K4000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K4000M and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000M is 1800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro K4000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K4000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14E-Q3 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |