Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Quadro M1000M and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 93 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro M1000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |