Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 138 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |