Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 206 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4508 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 614% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 169% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 1300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 625% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1020% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 | |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |