Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M3000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 150 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M3000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1,024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |